"You're a funny man, Sully ...

that's why I'm going to kill you last."


Monday, August 16, 2004


Before we head off for the corporate wilderness retreat over the next couple of days (i.e., no blogging), we refer you to
this Steve Gilliard post about Christopher Hitchens, his recent reaction to the “dry drunk” theory of George Bush, and most importantly what that reaction says about Hitchens himself.

Unsurprisingly, it’s that Hitchens has a drinking problem that he either hasn’t realized, or has and thinks he can handle and doesn’t need any help. But he has a problem nonetheless.

We’ve made light of this in the past, as have too many others shocked and dismayed (but probably not) at what Hitchens has become in the 21st century. But we did go back and read his VF piece, and Bisbort has it right: Hitchens clearly felt the arrow hitting close to home, and lashed back. His rationalizations and defenses of W. (see? He wasn’t really drunk that time (with the subtext that he, of course, would know what really drunk was. See? How can you be a dry drunk and a wet drunk at the same time (spoken like someone who’s fallen off the wagon so many times he can’t even tell the wagon and the ground apart anymore). See? Tony Blair supported the war too and he doesn’t drink) are in line with what alcoholics in serious denial say about themselves. We can hardly wait for the letters in response to this column.

He also tries to explain away what he presents as the strongest evidence that Bush has not tamed his drinking: the pretzel and bike incidents. We’ll grant that the bike flip was maybe just an accident; but his explanation for the president flipping pretzels is just absurd: another drunk story.

He ignores what some of us consider highly suspicious in this light: Bush’s hajiirah on 9/11 (he takes at face value his own assertion that Bush resisted the temptation to put one down that day; never mind the long absence from the cameras; his distracted, unfocused demeanor when he did briefly talk to reporters at the AF base in Louisiana and Cheney’s apparent use of a dubious rumor about another jet targeting the White House to keep him away from Washington. A long wait for the president to sober up is not at all inconsistent with everything that happened to Bush that day that we know about) and his delay in speaking to the nation about Saddam’s capture last December and apparent spaciness when he finally did (as
Quiddity Quack adroitly noted at the time). Again, more signs that the alcoholic Hitch is really defending is the one he sees when he shaves every morning.

Back to Gilliard, who ends this with a call for Hitch’s friends — and we know who one of them is — to do the right thing.

Now, I like to drink. I drink a lot less than I did, but there was never a day I needed to drink. The same is not true for Hitchens. Oh, he uses it as a prop. but everything about the man says he's a drunk. Sloppy, angry, and fueled by booze. Oh yeah, his hatred of AA, to which more than one person has suggested he check out. Personally, I think he needs to go to Betty Ford before his kidneys or liver give out. He’s cut maybe a decade off his life with his drinking, maybe two.

It’s a shame he doesn't have the courage to live a sober life. At least George Bush knew he had to stop drinking or lose his family. Of course, he didn’t do it honestly, or intelligently and replaced it with religious mania, but at least he tried to stop seriously. Hitchens, sadly, never has. He continues to drink to the point of comedy, defends his alcoholism in a way which is sad, because it draws on his former talents. Imagine how good he would be if he were sober and could think clearly? But he isn’t. Only his enablers keep him from sleeping in gutters. They hire him, they pay him and they watch him commit slow motion suicide.

If Hitchens had any real friends, they would do an intervention and get his ass to Betty Ford and force him to confront his bullshit. He’s a pathetic drunk, a sad drunk. How can you tell? One of the things about drunks is that they rage against AA, against help, since they don't have a problem.

We’re sure Sullivan has heard that line many times.

posted by Sully 8/16/2004 12:35:00 AM

Powered by Blogger


All material on this site copyrighted by author or authors.



Blogging the Blog Queen


“appl[ying] a magnifying glass to Andrew Sullivan’s performing-flea antics” – James Wolcott, Vanity Fair, April 2004.

Passionate rebuttal to Andrew Sullivan's frequent rants.

The Guardian

sullywatch AT

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More


There Is No Crisis: Protecting the Integrity of Social Security

Also see:

Smarter Andrew Sullivan (on hiatus, alas)

More blogs about Andrew Sullivan.

And for satire:

Neal Pollack (on hiatus as well)

Our inspiration:

Media Whores Online (presently out to pasture, but hopefully to return soon now that they are needed again)

Other watchers:


WarBlogger Watch

LGF Watch




DeCal (Cal Thomas)



The Daily Howler

Media Matters


The small village of bloggers who try to keep Sullivan honest (among other things):


Democratic Veteran

By the Bayou


Best of Both Worlds

Steve Brady

Other blogs of interest:



The Daily Kos

The Rittenhouse Review

Roger Ailes


Max Sawicky

Very Very Happy

Talking Points Memo



No More Mister Nice Blog

Steve Gilliard



Abu Aardvark

Ted Barlow (now at

Crooked Timber)

CalPundit (now at the Washington Monthly as Political Animal)

David Ehrenstein

Brad Delong

World O’ Crap

Tom Tomorrow

Oliver Willis

skippy the bush kangaroo

Public Nuisance

Bruce Garrett

are you effin’ kidding me?

Light of Reason


Onanism Today

The Suicide Letters

The Antic Muse (now Wonkette)

Sadly, No!


Anonymous Blogger

Scoobie Davis


Baghdad Burning

Whiskey Bar

Busy Busy Busy

We Report, You Deride


The Tooney Bin

Adam Kotsko

Nasty Riffraff

A Brooklyn Bridge

Suburban Guerrilla

Dave Cullen

Approximately Perfect

Trust me, you have no idea how much I hate Bush.

Beautiful Atrocities




Also worth checking out


The Cursor

Journal of American Politics

The George Bush AWOL Project

The Daily Kos



Greatest Hits (ours):


The Alaskan climate graph examined

Proof positive that Sullivan cannot, and should not, be trusted as a journalist to get his facts right.


The fisking of Norah Vincent

How we drove her out of Blogistan almost all by ourselves.


Excerpts from Lee Siegel's 2001 Harper's piece

Online here exclusively.


Why we blog the way we blog

A reply to some legitimate and friendly criticisms from Andrew Edwards


Why we blog the way we blog, Part II.

A reply to some of the same criticisms from the less friendly (back then) Arthur Silber


Bush-hating and proud of it

Our response to David Brooks.


Who Was That Masked Man?

The Horse remembered.


How the media lynched O.J. Simpson

Off-topic and our most controversial post ever.


Journalists behaving badly, updated.

Our wedding gift to Ruth Shalit, former TNR It Girl




Eve Tushnet's classic zinger

Sullivan has never quite been put in his place like this. Even Mickey Kaus thought it was funny.


"Bush reveals his poisonous colours"

Diane E. goes digging through the memory hole and finds a Times of London column Sullivan would prefer be forgotten.


The Datalounge list of potential titles for his memoirs

As reposted by Atrios


"The Princess of Provincetown"

Jim Capozzola goes further in that direction than we would ever dare.


Sullivan urges the Bush Administration to lie to the public

Brendan and Ben catch him in the act.


The Washington Times: An irredeemably left-wing rag

Bob Somerby shows the consequences of Sullivan's own logic of media bias


The Central Tenets of the Blogosphere

Derived from Sullivan’s blogging by s.z. of World O’ Crap and posted as a comment at Sadly, No!