"You're a funny man, Sully ...

that's why I'm going to kill you last."


Friday, February 25, 2005


Sullivan finally, apropos of nothing whatsoever, for once brings up something many people wondered if he would talk about: the growing Gannon/Guckert scandal.

By rights, of course, as you all know, he should have publicly recused himself from doing so since the story hits too close to home. Or at least the part of it he gives his game away over by being too concerned with.

The Reynolds post he links to (we have only once linked to Reynolds, and don’t do so since Glenn blogrolls Little Green Goofballs) is an extraordinarily weak thing to say you agree to.

Glenn basically takes a subliterate emailer as representative of the whole argument and tries to torque it around to being about liberal outrage that the gay Guckert is a conservative. We salute whoever it was on the right who came up with the idea to spin it that way, but Reynolds deals not at all with the “substantial” part of the story, and by link neither does Sullivan.

Let’s go over this one more time:
  1. Man with past and present as gay prostitute/military pimp gets White House press pass to help Scott McClellan out with pro-Bush leading questions (last part is not a scandal in and of itself).
  2. With no prior journalistic background or experience, and already having been rejected for a Capitol press pass, he joins a hastily created news organization with close ties to a Republican think tank owned by a big Texas Republican fundraiser, a news organization that puts all its content on its site for free and runs few ads save for the think tank, making it hard to ascertain how it meets the standards for accredited news organizations covering the White House that require that the organization derive its revenues from reporting the news.
  3. In this position he gets either a hard permanent pass, despite FBI screening that should have revealed both his seedy yet quite public past in an illegal activity and his $20,000 back-tax bill to Delaware; or a regular day pass despite Secret Service edicts ending this practice after 9/11.
  4. Not only this, he is apparently tipped off by the White House about certain big stories, and leaked important documents, some classified, just ever-so-slightly ahead of the mainstream media.

Gannon/Guckert’s homosexuality is not totally irrelevant to the issue. Now, if the right is, as outrage like this is betraying, mad at the left for forcing it to confront the blatant homosexuality of one of its lesser members, much as they were about the Mary Cheney “disclosures”) that’s their problem. They should not be blaming liberals for inadvertently bringing this to their attention.

But let’s remember what the real issue is. Since he was not (unlike Sullivan) out and proud, and traveled among circles where, as Sullivan should know only too well, homosexuality, even among a dyed-in-the-wool patriotic conservative (and remember that Gannon did in fact write anti-gay material for Talon, whatever Smalltown Boy thinks), has never been fully accepted, this was blackmail material. Just like the outstanding tax bill.

A long time back, so long ago we don’t feel like looking for the post so late, Sullivan got all hyped at The Washington Post for reporting that a Virginia man slated to go to Iraq pre-3/19 as an arms inspector was active in the DC-area S&M scene. Exposure! Outing! No Privacy! howled Captain Bareback. It completely didn’t cross his mind what could have happened if one of Saddam’s agents had gotten a hold of that information first and the Post had never published. And so we said at the time.

And today, it completely fails to cross Sullivan’s mind what might have happened if everyone had just pretended those websites, viewable by anyone, didn’t exist ... except for the Adams Morgan al-Qaa‘idah cell. And Reynolds. And Lileks.

Whatever Corn wants to believe, this may well not be trivial. Perhaps Gannon/Guckert had gay acquaintances or clients in the White House Communications Office pull strings for him despite heightened security precautions. Perhaps not. But it goes deeper than that.

Someone wanted Gannon in the White House press pool for something over and above tossing softballs at Bush (if that was all they needed, they already had Les Kinsolving). The creation of Talon News alone is fishy enough to warrant some questions. There is evidence of intelligence connections around the edge — let’s get to the bottom of this.

Michael Getler thinks it’s a story. The conservative news service WorldNetDaily does too (OK, maybe they’re just jealous, and Joseph Farah is getting a little snitty with the administration lately). Smaller newspapers like the Portland Oregonian know this isn’t a bloggers vs. the world story. It’s more.

BELATED UPDATE: Jo agrees completely.

posted by Sully 2/25/2005 10:28:00 PM

Thursday, February 24, 2005

“Newt Gingirch”

posted by Sully 2/24/2005 04:05:00 PM

Wednesday, February 23, 2005


John Whiteside again points out how late and lame Sully is with his iPod piece:
Sullivan more or less stumbles into the real point: “Americans are beginning to narrow their lives.” Well, that would have been an interesting statement around 1998. Today, it’s like pointing out that the storm is coming as the floodwaters reach your roofline.

posted by Sully 2/23/2005 09:47:00 PM


To Sager and Sullivan we can only say one thing, over and over.
Bow down before the one you serve.
You’re going to get what you deserve.

posted by Sully 2/23/2005 09:41:00 PM

Tuesday, February 22, 2005


P O’Neill has the latest amusing take on how Sullivan seems not to have given up blogging so much as reduced his exposure to criticism, complete with pertinent Kinks quote.

He also reports it turns out that the homoeroticism-laden quote from Jose Canseco about him and Mark McGwire may have some reality-based problems.
Many of his claims are difficult to believe. The thought of Canseco and McGwire in a clubhouse bathroom stall injecting each other’s buttocks is borderline ludicrous. First, the two were so big, even pre-steroids, that they wouldn’t even fit into a stall (it would be like a couple of elephants attempting to drink lattes together inside of a Volkswagen). Second, scores of teammates from the Oakland days will tell you the two were never very close.

Actually, maybe the first part of the quote should be taken with a grain of salt. The sportswriter in question is arguing from purely theoretical grounds, and we’d bet that there are at least a few gay men out there who have a more realistic take on whether two men of their dimensions could fit inside a typical men’s bathroom stall and, uh, inject each other in the buttocks (it would help to know just how big the bathroom stalls in the A’s clubhouse actually are). A lot depends on whether you actually shut the door or not.

The second part casts more doubt on the story, we think.

As for Sullivan’s sudden desire to quit, even if he hasn’t, as so often with us we find a Pink Floyd song most to the point:


I wanna go home

Take off this uniform and leave the show.

And I’m waiting here in this cell

Because I have to know, have to know, have to know

... have I been guilty all this time?

... have to know, have to know, have to know ...

You all know what comes next ...

Caught red-handed showing feelings ... showing feelings ... of an almost human nature. This will not do

posted by Sully 2/22/2005 12:56:00 PM


Roger Ailes, in addition to being the latest to note Sullivan’s not-blogging blogging, takes Smalltown Boy to task for not broadly applying his concern for academic freedom.
I can’t remember Sully comparing the demands for the firing of Howell Raines or Jordan Eason or Trent Lott or Ward Churchill to the Great Purge. In fact, it was Sully who — more jackass than wolf — was braying for blood in the Raines and Lott cases. There’s more Stalinism in Sully’s retroactive editing his earlier writings than there is in the remarks of those taking issue with Summers’ assertions.

posted by Sully 2/22/2005 12:38:00 PM

Powered by Blogger


All material on this site copyrighted by author or authors.



Blogging the Blog Queen


“appl[ying] a magnifying glass to Andrew Sullivan’s performing-flea antics” – James Wolcott, Vanity Fair, April 2004.

Passionate rebuttal to Andrew Sullivan's frequent rants.

The Guardian

sullywatch AT

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More


There Is No Crisis: Protecting the Integrity of Social Security

Also see:

Smarter Andrew Sullivan (on hiatus, alas)

More blogs about Andrew Sullivan.

And for satire:

Neal Pollack (on hiatus as well)

Our inspiration:

Media Whores Online (presently out to pasture, but hopefully to return soon now that they are needed again)

Other watchers:


WarBlogger Watch

LGF Watch




DeCal (Cal Thomas)



The Daily Howler

Media Matters


The small village of bloggers who try to keep Sullivan honest (among other things):


Democratic Veteran

By the Bayou


Best of Both Worlds

Steve Brady

Other blogs of interest:



The Daily Kos

The Rittenhouse Review

Roger Ailes


Max Sawicky

Very Very Happy

Talking Points Memo



No More Mister Nice Blog

Steve Gilliard



Abu Aardvark

Ted Barlow (now at

Crooked Timber)

CalPundit (now at the Washington Monthly as Political Animal)

David Ehrenstein

Brad Delong

World O’ Crap

Tom Tomorrow

Oliver Willis

skippy the bush kangaroo

Public Nuisance

Bruce Garrett

are you effin’ kidding me?

Light of Reason


Onanism Today

The Suicide Letters

The Antic Muse (now Wonkette)

Sadly, No!


Anonymous Blogger

Scoobie Davis


Baghdad Burning

Whiskey Bar

Busy Busy Busy

We Report, You Deride


The Tooney Bin

Adam Kotsko

Nasty Riffraff

A Brooklyn Bridge

Suburban Guerrilla

Dave Cullen

Approximately Perfect

Trust me, you have no idea how much I hate Bush.

Beautiful Atrocities




Also worth checking out


The Cursor

Journal of American Politics

The George Bush AWOL Project

The Daily Kos



Greatest Hits (ours):


The Alaskan climate graph examined

Proof positive that Sullivan cannot, and should not, be trusted as a journalist to get his facts right.


The fisking of Norah Vincent

How we drove her out of Blogistan almost all by ourselves.


Excerpts from Lee Siegel's 2001 Harper's piece

Online here exclusively.


Why we blog the way we blog

A reply to some legitimate and friendly criticisms from Andrew Edwards


Why we blog the way we blog, Part II.

A reply to some of the same criticisms from the less friendly (back then) Arthur Silber


Bush-hating and proud of it

Our response to David Brooks.


Who Was That Masked Man?

The Horse remembered.


How the media lynched O.J. Simpson

Off-topic and our most controversial post ever.


Journalists behaving badly, updated.

Our wedding gift to Ruth Shalit, former TNR It Girl




Eve Tushnet's classic zinger

Sullivan has never quite been put in his place like this. Even Mickey Kaus thought it was funny.


"Bush reveals his poisonous colours"

Diane E. goes digging through the memory hole and finds a Times of London column Sullivan would prefer be forgotten.


The Datalounge list of potential titles for his memoirs

As reposted by Atrios


"The Princess of Provincetown"

Jim Capozzola goes further in that direction than we would ever dare.


Sullivan urges the Bush Administration to lie to the public

Brendan and Ben catch him in the act.


The Washington Times: An irredeemably left-wing rag

Bob Somerby shows the consequences of Sullivan's own logic of media bias


The Central Tenets of the Blogosphere

Derived from Sullivan’s blogging by s.z. of World O’ Crap and posted as a comment at Sadly, No!