SullyWatch

"You're a funny man, Sully ...

that's why I'm going to kill you last."

 

Friday, May 20, 2005

WHEN SOMEONE LOSES AN EYE:

For our part, we just want to point out something in that quote from the Times:
Some of the same M.P.’s took a particular interest in an emotionally disturbed Afghan detainee who was known to eat his feces and mutilate himself with concertina wire. The soldiers kneed the man repeatedly in the legs and, at one point, chained him with his arms straight up in the air, Specialist Callaway told investigators. They also nicknamed him “Timmy,” after a disabled child in the animated television series “South Park.” One of the guards who beat the prisoner also taught him to screech like the cartoon character, Specialist Callaway said.
Perhaps Sullivan might want to rethink the “South Park Republican” meme he has become so fond of himself for creating?

posted by Sully 5/20/2005 12:46:00 PM

Wednesday, May 18, 2005

JUST HOW GAY IS JOHN PODHORETZ NORMANSON, REALLY?:

As noted at Alicublog and Best of Both Worlds, and summed up by a returning Atrios this morning (thanks a lot for the link!), Sullivan’s refusal to let the right off the hook on the Newsweek story has (ahem) engendered a great deal of them to drop the gloves and use subtle code words to suggest that, well, he’s gay so we could never really trust him.

The meanest came, unsurprisingly, from John Podhoretz Normanson, a recent addition to the NRA Corner Crew. His boorishness and homophobia are, of course, no surprise to any reader of David Brock’s Blinded by the Right.

Not to be outdone, Sullivan fired back with “
I'd wager I know much less about Joan Crawford, Mae West or Bette Davis than John does.”

OOOOOOHHHH! This is Sullivan’s way of saying the gloves are off and may never come back on again.

Podhoretz-Normanson has never, you see, entirely cleared himself of suspicions that he is himself gay. Yeah, he got married a couple of years ago (after hotfooting it out of his first marriage sometime before), but his homophobia has been of the kind that even those sympathetic to it sometimes see as the protective coat of someone who really does, deep down inside, swing that way.

Add to that his infamous pseudonym (“Tiffany Midgeson”) when he was the Washington Times’ gossip columnist and widely acknowledged as the worst ever to hold that position at any newspaper anywhere ever (Supposedly staffers at the rival Washington Post would gather for hootenanny-like sessions of reading the column out loud over hysterical laughter). And that Midge Decter is his mother. ’Nuff said.

Sullivan, by slantingly alluding to this for the fisrt time ever outside the snarky gay world of anonymous comments on blog posts, has really opened a can of worms here. We may yet get to see the parting on the right that we’ve been awaiting for so long.

And wouldn’t it be funny if it was started by Mr. Anti-Outing himself?

posted by Sully 5/18/2005 10:39:00 PM

NO COMMENT NECESSARY:
You should follow the lead of Thomas Friedman and actually visit these countries
Or, this is proof that he actually does make up emails. Not that, this time, we mind — it is pretty funny.

posted by Sully 5/18/2005 11:16:00 AM

WELL, NICE TO SEE YOU ADMIT THIS AFTER ALL THESE YEARS:
Before this war started, I wouldn’t have even considered the possibility that the U.S. was guilty.

posted by Sully 5/18/2005 11:05:00 AM

Tuesday, May 17, 2005

DEVELOPING ... HARDLY?:

Uh, Andrew, that Christianity Today story is a good six months old.

It also seems like all he did was read the Google summary of the story. For there is nothing in it to suggest that Bush is losing evangelical support over Abu Ghraib.

Rather, it seems, the issue is that a lot of high-ranking evangelicals (a phrase increasingly redundant when applied to the Bush administration) were directly involved in creating the legal climate under which torture was justified.

The relevant parts:

What emerged was troubling. Beyond setting Bush administration priorities, evangelicals were significantly involved in drafting policy memos that created the permissive climate in which the abuse of prisoners occurred. Asking not to be named, Christians who serve in federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies told CT that aggressive interrogation of suspected terrorists was no-holds-barred. Bob Woodward, the author of a definitive book on Bush's war effort, told CT, “It was very clear from my interviews that [Bush] felt the gloves were off for the CIA.”

In a February 7, 2002, executive order, the President wrote that he wanted prisoners in the war on terror treated “humanely” but also “consistent with military necessity.”

He also explicitly argued that the Geneva Convention’s guidelines for treatment of prisoners of war did not apply to terrorists. Evangelical legal scholar John Yoo contributed to several of the legal memos for Attorney General John Ashcroft justifying much harsher interrogation techniques in the war against terrorism.

Yoo declared, “Terrorists have no Geneva rights.” (The Geneva Conventions do not address how nations in wartime should handle persons who are agents of hostile, clandestine organizations rather than members of the military arm of a recognized government.)

A well-known evangelical, Army Lt. Gen. William G. “Jerry” Boykin, deputy undersecretary of defense for intelligence, heads what some label a worldwide find-and-hit squad against terrorists. And one top Pentagon-related expert who taught officers how to interrogate Muslims is an evangelical.


But, to be fair, some evangelicals thought otherwise:
But there were also evangelicals within the Bush administration who opposed aggressive interrogation of suspected terrorists. An evangelical scholar with high-level ties to the Defense intelligence policymakers told CT about personal disillusionment with the Bush administration. “We have got a global inquisition and this is not Monty Python,” the specialist declared, referring to the abusive questioning of terror suspects.

The internal debate transcended the traditional “hawk” or “dove” division. Evangelicals sought to link faith and policy in setting moral boundaries in the war against terrorism. Evangelicals have been especially concerned with appropriate methods to question terrorists who claim fervent religious motivation. One source told CT that religion has become a “critical dimension” in 21st-century warfare.

This and some poll cited in the story (none of which, it should be noted, deal with self-identified evangelicals as a group) seem to justify the one sentence which led Sullivan to make the claim confidently:
The bottom line is that, for some evangelicals, Bush and his advisers, many of whom are conservative Christians, have lost a measure of trust and support because of this scandal.
This was a really sloppy story that wasn’t worth linking too. There are no direct quotes from any named evangelical outside the administration supporting this conclusion, and the direct quotes from non-Administration sources are protective and defensive.

As much as we’d like to believe Sully on this one, it just ain’t proven here.

posted by Sully 5/17/2005 08:08:00 PM

WHO GOT BALLS? HE GOT BALLS!:
Captain James Yee, originally and unsuccessfully framed by the military as a spy, was the Muslim chaplain at Guantanamo.

Uh, Smalltown Boy, who aided in the framing when it was originally taking place?

And, we might add, has never apologized for what he implied there.

QUICK UPDATE: Reread Jo Fish’s harsh words on this subject.



posted by Sully 5/17/2005 07:59:00 PM

Powered by Blogger

 

All material on this site copyrighted by author or authors.

 

 

Blogging the Blog Queen

or,

“appl[ying] a magnifying glass to Andrew Sullivan’s performing-flea antics” – James Wolcott, Vanity Fair, April 2004.

Passionate rebuttal to Andrew Sullivan's frequent rants.

The Guardian

sullywatch AT mail.bg

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

THERE IS NO SOCIAL SECURITY CRISIS

There Is No Crisis: Protecting the Integrity of Social Security

Also see:

Smarter Andrew Sullivan (on hiatus, alas)

More blogs about Andrew Sullivan.

And for satire:

Neal Pollack (on hiatus as well)

Our inspiration:

Media Whores Online (presently out to pasture, but hopefully to return soon now that they are needed again)

Other watchers:

InstaWatch

WarBlogger Watch

LGF Watch

HorowitzWatch

MalkinWatch

KausPatrol

DeCal (Cal Thomas)

ConWebWatch

LucianneWatch

The Daily Howler

Media Matters

 

The small village of bloggers who try to keep Sullivan honest (among other things):

 

Democratic Veteran

By the Bayou

WareMouse

Best of Both Worlds

Steve Brady

Other blogs of interest:

 

Eschaton

The Daily Kos

The Rittenhouse Review

Roger Ailes

TAPped

Max Sawicky

Very Very Happy

Talking Points Memo

uggabugga

TBogg

No More Mister Nice Blog

Steve Gilliard

Hullaballoo

Pandagon

Abu Aardvark

Ted Barlow (now at

Crooked Timber)

CalPundit (now at the Washington Monthly as Political Animal)

David Ehrenstein

Brad Delong

World O’ Crap

Tom Tomorrow

Oliver Willis

skippy the bush kangaroo

Public Nuisance

Bruce Garrett

are you effin’ kidding me?

Light of Reason

Terminus

Onanism Today

The Suicide Letters

The Antic Muse (now Wonkette)

Sadly, No!

corrente

Anonymous Blogger

Scoobie Davis

Textism

Baghdad Burning

Whiskey Bar

Busy Busy Busy

We Report, You Deride

Silt

The Tooney Bin

Adam Kotsko

Nasty Riffraff

A Brooklyn Bridge

Suburban Guerrilla

Dave Cullen

Approximately Perfect

Trust me, you have no idea how much I hate Bush.

Beautiful Atrocities

  

 

 

Also worth checking out

 

The Cursor

Journal of American Politics

The George Bush AWOL Project

The Daily Kos

 

 

Greatest Hits (ours):

 

The Alaskan climate graph examined

Proof positive that Sullivan cannot, and should not, be trusted as a journalist to get his facts right.

 

The fisking of Norah Vincent

How we drove her out of Blogistan almost all by ourselves.

 

Excerpts from Lee Siegel's 2001 Harper's piece

Online here exclusively.

 

Why we blog the way we blog

A reply to some legitimate and friendly criticisms from Andrew Edwards

 

Why we blog the way we blog, Part II.

A reply to some of the same criticisms from the less friendly (back then) Arthur Silber

 

Bush-hating and proud of it

Our response to David Brooks.

 

Who Was That Masked Man?

The Horse remembered.

 

How the media lynched O.J. Simpson

Off-topic and our most controversial post ever.

 

Journalists behaving badly, updated.

Our wedding gift to Ruth Shalit, former TNR It Girl

 

(others)

 

Eve Tushnet's classic zinger

Sullivan has never quite been put in his place like this. Even Mickey Kaus thought it was funny.

 

"Bush reveals his poisonous colours"

Diane E. goes digging through the memory hole and finds a Times of London column Sullivan would prefer be forgotten.

 

The Datalounge list of potential titles for his memoirs

As reposted by Atrios

 

"The Princess of Provincetown"

Jim Capozzola goes further in that direction than we would ever dare.

 

Sullivan urges the Bush Administration to lie to the public

Brendan and Ben catch him in the act.

 

The Washington Times: An irredeemably left-wing rag

Bob Somerby shows the consequences of Sullivan's own logic of media bias

 

The Central Tenets of the Blogosphere

Derived from Sullivan’s blogging by s.z. of World O’ Crap and posted as a comment at Sadly, No!

Past
current