"You're a funny man, Sully ...

that's why I'm going to kill you last."


Thursday, September 22, 2005


That’s about all we can say regarding the Rita/geoduck obsession. And about Sullivan’s entire post-TNR career, CTTOI.

posted by Sully 9/22/2005 10:05:00 PM


The Novak column Sully links to has to be the most unintentionally funny thing we’ve read in quite a while, what with all this Plame-based irony its author probably doesn’t even realize he put in:
“All discussions are off the record,” admonished the conference’s printed schedule. Consequently, I will refrain from specifically quoting panelists and audience members. But the admonition says nothing about personal conversations outside the sessions.
Oh, really, Nofacts?
Even if I am violating the spirit of secrecy rules, revealing criticism of Bush by this elite group, and the paucity of defense for him, is valuable in reflecting the president's parlous political condition.
Translation: You hearing this, Fitzgerald? My any-way-you-slice-it violation of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act was valuable in reflecting Joseph Wilson’s parlous political condition. Indict me if you dare!

Really, it’s almost like he’s walking around with his fly open ...

Of course, anyone who at least up front tells you “
Nor do I feel inhibited in quoting myself,” is setting you up for the real subject of this column: Bob Novak’s Baaaaaaad Aaaaaaassss Song.
In the absence of any disagreement, I took the floor to suggest there are scientists and bioethicists with dissenting views and that it was not productive to demean opposing views as based on “religious dogma.” The response was peeved criticism of my intervention and certainly no support.

I do not see myself as a defender of the Bush presidency, and I am sure the White House does not regard me as such. But as a member of the second panel consisting of journalists, I felt constrained to argue against implications that Hurricane Katrina should cause the president to rediscover race and poverty. My comments again generated more criticism from the audience and obvious exasperation by Charlie Rose. Indeed, after the closing dinner Saturday night, the moderator made clear he was displeased by my conduct.


Longtime participants in Forstmann Little conferences (this was my first and, after this column, probably my last) told me they had not experienced such hostility against a Republican president at previous events.
The real question, Bob, is why you were invited in the first place, especially after that stunning performance on CNN. You gave the people what they wanted, and you’ll be back next year to play the little court jester you’ve long since become.

Oh, and we like this one:
Critics of the president who are vocal and supporters who are reticent comprise a massive communications failure.
There’s a shorter word for this phenomenon, Bob: embarassment, something you clearly stopped feeling a long time ago.

(And just what is happening to English usage, anyway? How, exactly, do the described phenomena “comprise” a massive communciations failure? Isn’t it more accurate to say that those things are the result of a massive communications failure? What word was he thinking of?)

posted by Sully 9/22/2005 09:41:00 PM

Tuesday, September 20, 2005


Oh? That avian flu wiki? That’s been around for a couple of months now.

posted by Sully 9/20/2005 06:03:00 PM


Does anyone else think he decided to blog so aggressively about the new North Korean nuke agreement just so he could make a cute reference to Team America?

posted by Sully 9/20/2005 05:50:00 PM


We were going to get Sullivan’s Times Home Delivery User ID and post it here for him.

But we won’t. Not because we didn’t want to — we figured Sullivan wouldn’t mind, and having his password info widely known would be a good way to make TimesSelect utterly useless, a goal with which we are in agreement with him.

Because it turns out that at his Provincetown address, he isn’t the subscriber of record. Another way of putting this is that we don’t know The Boyfriend’s last name.

Leaving that aside, isn’t it a little bit disingenuous for Sully to play the martyr on this one if it’s not his money? And what, exactly, does his nonchalance about even making the 1-800-NY-TIMES call (real simple; no long hold time for us, we were on and off in two minutes) say about his ability to handle any editing position like running The New Republic again, ever? Especially in the context of his property-tax troubles?

posted by Sully 9/20/2005 05:35:00 PM

And if you think his cognitive and moral dissonance is rough, try being a gay Republican ...
Uh, hasn’t Sullivan said in the past that he doesn’t consider himself a Republican, that he owes nothing to either political party, that he’s a conservative rather than a Republican?

posted by Sully 9/20/2005 05:29:00 PM

Powered by Blogger


All material on this site copyrighted by author or authors.



Blogging the Blog Queen


“appl[ying] a magnifying glass to Andrew Sullivan’s performing-flea antics” – James Wolcott, Vanity Fair, April 2004.

Passionate rebuttal to Andrew Sullivan's frequent rants.

The Guardian

sullywatch AT

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More


There Is No Crisis: Protecting the Integrity of Social Security

Also see:

Smarter Andrew Sullivan (on hiatus, alas)

More blogs about Andrew Sullivan.

And for satire:

Neal Pollack (on hiatus as well)

Our inspiration:

Media Whores Online (presently out to pasture, but hopefully to return soon now that they are needed again)

Other watchers:


WarBlogger Watch

LGF Watch




DeCal (Cal Thomas)



The Daily Howler

Media Matters


The small village of bloggers who try to keep Sullivan honest (among other things):


Democratic Veteran

By the Bayou


Best of Both Worlds

Steve Brady

Other blogs of interest:



The Daily Kos

The Rittenhouse Review

Roger Ailes


Max Sawicky

Very Very Happy

Talking Points Memo



No More Mister Nice Blog

Steve Gilliard



Abu Aardvark

Ted Barlow (now at

Crooked Timber)

CalPundit (now at the Washington Monthly as Political Animal)

David Ehrenstein

Brad Delong

World O’ Crap

Tom Tomorrow

Oliver Willis

skippy the bush kangaroo

Public Nuisance

Bruce Garrett

are you effin’ kidding me?

Light of Reason


Onanism Today

The Suicide Letters

The Antic Muse (now Wonkette)

Sadly, No!


Anonymous Blogger

Scoobie Davis


Baghdad Burning

Whiskey Bar

Busy Busy Busy

We Report, You Deride


The Tooney Bin

Adam Kotsko

Nasty Riffraff

A Brooklyn Bridge

Suburban Guerrilla

Dave Cullen

Approximately Perfect

Trust me, you have no idea how much I hate Bush.

Beautiful Atrocities




Also worth checking out


The Cursor

Journal of American Politics

The George Bush AWOL Project

The Daily Kos



Greatest Hits (ours):


The Alaskan climate graph examined

Proof positive that Sullivan cannot, and should not, be trusted as a journalist to get his facts right.


The fisking of Norah Vincent

How we drove her out of Blogistan almost all by ourselves.


Excerpts from Lee Siegel's 2001 Harper's piece

Online here exclusively.


Why we blog the way we blog

A reply to some legitimate and friendly criticisms from Andrew Edwards


Why we blog the way we blog, Part II.

A reply to some of the same criticisms from the less friendly (back then) Arthur Silber


Bush-hating and proud of it

Our response to David Brooks.


Who Was That Masked Man?

The Horse remembered.


How the media lynched O.J. Simpson

Off-topic and our most controversial post ever.


Journalists behaving badly, updated.

Our wedding gift to Ruth Shalit, former TNR It Girl




Eve Tushnet's classic zinger

Sullivan has never quite been put in his place like this. Even Mickey Kaus thought it was funny.


"Bush reveals his poisonous colours"

Diane E. goes digging through the memory hole and finds a Times of London column Sullivan would prefer be forgotten.


The Datalounge list of potential titles for his memoirs

As reposted by Atrios


"The Princess of Provincetown"

Jim Capozzola goes further in that direction than we would ever dare.


Sullivan urges the Bush Administration to lie to the public

Brendan and Ben catch him in the act.


The Washington Times: An irredeemably left-wing rag

Bob Somerby shows the consequences of Sullivan's own logic of media bias


The Central Tenets of the Blogosphere

Derived from Sullivan’s blogging by s.z. of World O’ Crap and posted as a comment at Sadly, No!